Monday, 14 May 2012

Interracial Marriage in 18th Century Britain

OK it has been ages since I blogged, 2009 to be exact.  I was going to begin a whole new blog but decided to keep it but start from where I am at now.  I am doing a PhD in theology but which encompasses history, sociology, gender studies and the list goes on.  Specifically I am looking at Black pentecostal women in the British church this will be my focus but there will be so many other areas and things of interest in my purview.  I am finding out new things every time I read and this blog will function as a place to put things I have found interesting.  Sometimes with comment, sometimes not. Please feel free to comment if you feel the need.  Blessings and I look forward to discussions.


So I have to do literature surveys and the stuff you come across.....

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/work_community/docs/belisarius_list.htm

document


This is the manifest for Belisarius, a ship that set sail for Sierra Leone in 1787.  The transcript below shows a transcript of the manifest. Whilst for hundreds of years interracial marriages in the US were illegal (as recently 1967 in Virginia) the manifest shows that black women were married to white men and black men were married in Britain from at least the 1800's. The relationship of British Blacks to British Whites are different to that of our American cousins.

Unfortunately the story does not end well of the 350 people who sailed only 60 survived.  Some dieing during the voyage, others at the hand of slave traders, native people, the climate or disease.

The Names of Men Women & Children who are now on board the Belisarius
Capt[ai]n Sill lying at the Motherbank 16 Feb[ruar]y 1787.
1
James Stiphson
30
Anth[on]y Hill
58
John Stewart
2
Jos[e]ph Taylor
1
Will[ia]m Anderson
9
Jno [John] Lewis
3
W[illia]m Theads
2
Will[ia]m Smith
60
Fra[nci]s Barlian
4
Ja[me]s White
3
Jno [John] Horne
1
Jno [John] Ramsey
5
Peter Grant
4
Edw[ar]d Smith
2
Jno [John] Thomas
6
Edw[ar]d Honeycot
5
Geo[rge] Hill
3
W[illia]m Hudson
7
Ja[me]s Murry
6
Jno [John] Thomas
4
Jno [John] Homan
8
Jos[e]ph Newman
7
Jno [John] Lewis
5
Jos[e]ph Hartford
9
Ja[me]s Neptune
8
Jno [John] Hall
6
Tho[ma]s Truman
10
Geo[rge] Jones
9
Jno [John] Wilson
7
Jno [John] Swithin
1
Ja[me]s Seaman
40
Will[ia]m Green
8
Lewis Latouch
2
John Thomas
1
Joseph Green Jun[io]r
9
Lewis Latouch Jun[io]r
3
Truro Ambo
2
Tho[ma]s Simms
70
Abr[aha]m Elliot Griffith
4
Jno [John] Solomon
3
Tho[ma]s Woodman
1
And[re]w James
5
Jos[e]ph Bromly
4
Ja[me]s Martin
2
Jos[e]ph George
6
Misheck Wright
5
W[illia]m Richardson
3
W[illia]m Close
7
Abraham Mathews
6
Fra[nci]s Durham
4
Geo[rge] Comfortable
8
Lewis Sterling
7
Jno [John] Jones
5
W[illia]m Lee
9
Charles Jones
8
Benj[ami]n Elliot
6
Jno [John] Jacob
20
George Brown
9
Jno [John] Marrine
7
Jno [John] Jacob Jun[io]r
1
W[illia]m Hoskins
50
Ja[me]s Marrine Jun[io]r
8
Jno [John] James
2
W[illia]m Williams
1
Geo[rge] Jones
9
W[illia]m Bromfield
3
John Thomas
2
Tho[ma]s Montague
80
Jno [John] Walter
4
John Thomas
3
Jno [John] Peters
5
Rich[ar]d Guthrow
1
Richard Bradley
6
Arch[ibal]d Stewart
4
Jno [John] Twine
81
Black Men
7
Jno [John] Lawrence
5
Christ[ophe]r Friday
8
Jno [John] W[illia]m Ramsay
6
Tho[ma]s Holder
9
Ja[me]s Reid
7
Tho[ma]s Holder Jun[io]r


Black Women Married to White Men
White Women Married to Black Men
1
Nancy Hughes
2
Hester Wright
1
Mary Bradley
3
Eliza[beth] Jones
2
Marg[are]t Allen
4
Jane Gosport
3
Barbary Thomas
5
Hannah Stewart
4
Eliza[beth] Brown
6
Sarah Simpson
5
Eliza[beth] Ramsey
7
Christ[ia]n Horn
6
Marg[are]t Jackson
8
Ann Watson
7
Mary Adams
9
Martha Green
8
Eliz[abeth] Demain
10
Hannah Richardson
9
Ann Holder
11
Hannah Twine
10
Amelia Homan
12
Sarah Lee
1
Marg[are]t Latouch
13
Peggy Smith
2
Ann Provey
14
Martha Smith
3
Rebecca Griffith
15
Eliza[beth] Richardson
4
Martha James
16
Eliza[beth] Hartford
5
Mary Ann Lee
17
Jane Baptist
16
Mary Jacob
18
Mary James
16
White Women
18
Black Women
White Women wanting to be Married
1
Mary Allen
2
Jane Gosport
3
Mary Adams
4
Eliz[abeth] Robinson
5
Milly Shimmings

Friday, 13 March 2009

Mere Chrisitianity (cont) - 'The Thrill is Gone'


But the reality is that marriages do break down, the marriage loses the thrill it once had. The couple believe they're are no longer in love, they made a mistake and they are entitled to call it quits. But how do we know what love is, and thereby when we aren't 'in love'? Is it because we have been in love before and so when we are not in love we know or do we know because of what our friends have told us. For many neither is the case. Our understanding of love is 'coloured' by what we see in magazine, what we read in books, watch on tv or at the cinema. From the media we learn that when we have made the right choice and we get married we are always in love, there is an excitement and energy. So when we are not in love we know, it must have been a mistake so we leave. In time many of us find a new love with whom we 'fall in love' and the thrill returns but before long that thrill will go.
In marriage, as in every aspect of life, there is thrill at the beginning but it doesn't last. Think of when you go on holiday and you fall in love with the destination and think what a thrill it would be to live there, when you move there the thrill is short lived and in its place there is a 'quieter and more lasting kind of interest'. Lewis suggests that in marriage we should also realise that the initial thrill is only for a time and that if we submit to the loss of the thrill and settle down to the sober interest there will most likely be new thrills in some quite different direction. Allow the initial thrill run its natural course and die away; go on through that 'period of death' into the time of quieter interest and happiness that follows and you will find that you are living in a world of new thrills all the time. Lewis warns against trying to make thrill your regular diet or trying to prolong the thrill artificially. In time they will get weaker and weaker and fewer and fewer and you'll get bored and disillusioned.

Thursday, 5 March 2009

Mere Christianity (cont)


I found Lewis' chapter on marriage 'lovely'. A couple of chapters prior to this one Lewis says that great moral teachers don't acutally instruct their followers in anything new but they remind their followers of those things that they already know and which often get lost in the fog of life. So in this chapter Lewis reminded me that God intended marriage to be a 'single organism' (one flesh). In stating this God was not expressing a sentiment but a fact. A fact that can be equated to a lock and key, a violin and a bow - a violin is not a violin without its bow! Our inventor - God- made something that consisted of two parts. This union is complex. One aspect of this union is sexual but you cannot isolate this aspect from the whole and still gain the benefit of the whole. Just like you cannot get the full benefit of eating by just putting food in your mouth and not chewing, or tasting food and then spitting it out.

However it is this thing called love why so many people in the world get married and it is whilst 'in love' that promises to be true are made. Though made whilst in love the promise was made to be true even when love ceased. Lewis says of this




A promise must be about things I can do, about actions: no one can promise to go on feeling in a certain way. He may as well promise never to have a headache, or to always feel hungry


Being 'in love' may cease but this does not mean we should cease to love. Love goes beyond feeling,
"...it is a deep unity, maintained by the will and deliberately strengthned by habit -reinforced by (in Christian marriages) the grace which both ask for and recieve from God. They can have this love for each other even at those moments when you do not like yourself. They can retain this love even when each would easily, if allowed, be "in love" with someone else. Being 'in love' first moved them to promise fidelity, this quieter love enables them to keep the promise. It is on this love that the engine of marriage should run."